Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

´ÏÄÌ-ŸÀÌŸ´½ È£¼±ÀÇ »óÀüÀÌ ¿Âµµ ¹üÀ§¿Í »óÀüÀÌ Çൿ ºñ±³

Comparison of transition temperature range and phase transformation behavior of nickel-titanium wires

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2010³â 40±Ç 1È£ p.40 ~ 49
ÀÌÀ¯Çö, ÀÓ¹ü¼ø, ÀÌ¿ë±Ù, ±èöÀ§, ¹é½ÂÇÐ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀ¯Çö ( Lee Yu-Hyun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
ÀÓ¹ü¼ø ( Lim Bum-Soon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
ÀÌ¿ë±Ù ( Lee Yong-Keun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°ú»ýüÀç·á°úÇб³½Ç
±èöÀ§ ( Kim Cheol-Wi ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÀç·áÇб³½Ç
¹é½ÂÇР( Baek Seung-Hak ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº martensitic (M-NiTi), austenitic (A-NiTi) ¹× thermodynamic nickel-titanium wire (T-NiTi)ÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû Ư¡°ú »óÀüÀÌ Á¤µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Àç·á´Â 0.016 ¡¿ 0.022 inchÀÇ M-NiTi (Nitinol Classic, NC), A-NiTi (Optimalloy, OPTI)¿Í T-NiTi (Neo-Sentalloy, NEO)À̾úÀ¸¸ç, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), 3Á¡±ÁÈû½ÇÇè, X-ray diffraction (XRD), ¹Ì¼¼±¸Á¶ ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ANOVA test·Î Åë°èó¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. DSCºÐ¼® °á°ú OPTI¿Í NEO´Â heating curve¿¡¼­ 2°³ÀÇ peak, cooling curve¿¡¼­ 1°³ÀÇ peak¸¦ º¸¿´°í, NC´Â heating°ú cooling curve¿¡¼­ 1°³ÀÇ ³Ð°í ¾àÇÑ peak¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. Austenite finishing (Af) ¿Âµµ´Â OPTI 19.7oC, NEO 24.6oC, NC 52.4oC¿´´Ù. 3Á¡±ÁÈû½ÇÇè °á°ú NC, OPTI, NEO ¸ðµÎ residual deflectionÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, NC¿Í OPTIÀÇ load range°¡ NEOº¸´Ù ÄÇ´Ù. XRD¿Í ¹Ì¼¼±¸Á¶ ºÐ¼®°á°ú OPTI¿Í NEO´Â Martensite finishing (Mf)¿¡¼­ martensite¿Í austenite°¡ ¼¯¿© ÀÖÀ½ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. NEO¿Í OPTI´Â NCº¸´Ù °³¼±µÈ ¹°¸®Àû Ư¡°ú »óÀüÀÌ ÇàŸ¦ º¸¿´´Ù. NiTi È£¼±ÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû, ¿Âµµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÇàÅ´ ¿¹»óµÇ¾ú´ø »óÀüÀÌ Á¤µµ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¿Ïº®ÇÏ°Ô ¼³¸íµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ±× ÀÌÀ¯´Â º¹ÀâÇÑ martensite variantsÀÇ Á¸Àç¿Í ¿­°ú stress¿¡ ÀÇÇØ À¯µµµÈ µ¶¸³ÀûÀÎ »óÀüÀÌ¿¡ ±âÀÎÇÑ´Ù°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.

Objective:The aim of this research was to evaluate the mechanical properties (MP) and degree of the phase transformation (PT) of martensitic (M-NiTi), austenitic (A-NiTi) and thermodynamic nickel-titanium wire (T-NiTi).

Methods:The samples consisted of 0.016 ¡¿ 0.022 inch M-NiTi (Nitinol Classic, NC), A-NiTi (Optimalloy, OPTI) and T-NiTi (Neo-Sentalloy, NEO). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), three-point bending test, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and microstructure examination were used. Statistical evaluation was undertaken using ANOVA test.

results:In DSC analysis, OPTI and NEO showed two peaks in the heating curves and one peak in the cooling curves. However, NC revealed one single broad and weak peak in the heating and cooling curves. Austenite finishing (Af) temperatures were 19.7oC for OPTI, 24.6oC for NEO and 52.4oC for NC. In the three-point bending test, residual deflection was observed for NC, OPTI and NEO. The load ranges of NC and OPTI were broader and higher than NEO. XRD and microstructure analyses showed that OPTI and NEO had a mixture of martensite and austenite at temperatures below Martensite finishing (Mf). NEO and OPTI showed improved MP and PT behavior than NC.

Conclusions:The mechanical and thermal behaviors of NiTi wire cannot be completely explained by the expected degree of PT because of complicated martensite variants and independent PT induced by heat and stress.

Å°¿öµå

Transition temperature range;Phase transformation;Ni-Ti wires

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed